Julia Usage Analysis Paper

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Julia Usage Analysis Paper

Tomek Trzeciak
I've come across this paper analysing usage of Julia language features, an interesting read. I couldn't find this being mentioned on the list before, so here it is:

http://julia.lifehug.com/gqm/julia_paper.html

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Julia Usage Analysis Paper

Ivar Nesje
From the abstract: "(work began in 2009 and 1.0 was released in 2012)".

I'll send an email directly to the authors (in case they don't read julia-dev).

Ivar

kl. 12:57:36 UTC+2 mandag 28. juli 2014 skrev Tomek Trzeciak følgende:
I've come across this paper analysing usage of Julia language features, an interesting read. I couldn't find this being mentioned on the list before, so here it is:

<a href="http://julia.lifehug.com/gqm/julia_paper.html" target="_blank" onmousedown="this.href='http://www.google.com/url?q\75http%3A%2F%2Fjulia.lifehug.com%2Fgqm%2Fjulia_paper.html\46sa\75D\46sntz\0751\46usg\75AFQjCNG0ykYV-_9hZbyD8l9-4DXBv1XSWg';return true;" onclick="this.href='http://www.google.com/url?q\75http%3A%2F%2Fjulia.lifehug.com%2Fgqm%2Fjulia_paper.html\46sa\75D\46sntz\0751\46usg\75AFQjCNG0ykYV-_9hZbyD8l9-4DXBv1XSWg';return true;">http://julia.lifehug.com/gqm/julia_paper.html

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Julia Usage Analysis Paper

Iain Dunning
Seems like an undergrad project? I think by 1.0 they mean the 0.1 release.

On Monday, July 28, 2014 8:00:44 AM UTC-4, Ivar Nesje wrote:
From the abstract: "(work began in 2009 and 1.0 was released in 2012)".

I'll send an email directly to the authors (in case they don't read julia-dev).

Ivar

kl. 12:57:36 UTC+2 mandag 28. juli 2014 skrev Tomek Trzeciak følgende:
I've come across this paper analysing usage of Julia language features, an interesting read. I couldn't find this being mentioned on the list before, so here it is:

<a href="http://julia.lifehug.com/gqm/julia_paper.html" target="_blank" onmousedown="this.href='http://www.google.com/url?q\75http%3A%2F%2Fjulia.lifehug.com%2Fgqm%2Fjulia_paper.html\46sa\75D\46sntz\0751\46usg\75AFQjCNG0ykYV-_9hZbyD8l9-4DXBv1XSWg';return true;" onclick="this.href='http://www.google.com/url?q\75http%3A%2F%2Fjulia.lifehug.com%2Fgqm%2Fjulia_paper.html\46sa\75D\46sntz\0751\46usg\75AFQjCNG0ykYV-_9hZbyD8l9-4DXBv1XSWg';return true;">http://julia.lifehug.com/gqm/julia_paper.html

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Julia Usage Analysis Paper

Dahua Lin
Despite several minor mistakes like these, I think the analysis in general is useful.

Dahua


On Monday, July 28, 2014 7:48:06 PM UTC-5, Iain Dunning wrote:
Seems like an undergrad project? I think by 1.0 they mean the 0.1 release.

On Monday, July 28, 2014 8:00:44 AM UTC-4, Ivar Nesje wrote:
From the abstract: "(work began in 2009 and 1.0 was released in 2012)".

I'll send an email directly to the authors (in case they don't read julia-dev).

Ivar

kl. 12:57:36 UTC+2 mandag 28. juli 2014 skrev Tomek Trzeciak følgende:
I've come across this paper analysing usage of Julia language features, an interesting read. I couldn't find this being mentioned on the list before, so here it is:

<a href="http://julia.lifehug.com/gqm/julia_paper.html" target="_blank" onmousedown="this.href='http://www.google.com/url?q\75http%3A%2F%2Fjulia.lifehug.com%2Fgqm%2Fjulia_paper.html\46sa\75D\46sntz\0751\46usg\75AFQjCNG0ykYV-_9hZbyD8l9-4DXBv1XSWg';return true;" onclick="this.href='http://www.google.com/url?q\75http%3A%2F%2Fjulia.lifehug.com%2Fgqm%2Fjulia_paper.html\46sa\75D\46sntz\0751\46usg\75AFQjCNG0ykYV-_9hZbyD8l9-4DXBv1XSWg';return true;">http://julia.lifehug.com/gqm/julia_paper.html

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Julia Usage Analysis Paper

Mike Innes
The original blog post announces that 1.0 is being released, so it's an understandable mistake.


On 29 July 2014 05:32, Dahua <[hidden email]> wrote:
Despite several minor mistakes like these, I think the analysis in general is useful.

Dahua



On Monday, July 28, 2014 7:48:06 PM UTC-5, Iain Dunning wrote:
Seems like an undergrad project? I think by 1.0 they mean the 0.1 release.

On Monday, July 28, 2014 8:00:44 AM UTC-4, Ivar Nesje wrote:
From the abstract: "(work began in 2009 and 1.0 was released in 2012)".

I'll send an email directly to the authors (in case they don't read julia-dev).

Ivar

kl. 12:57:36 UTC+2 mandag 28. juli 2014 skrev Tomek Trzeciak følgende:
I've come across this paper analysing usage of Julia language features, an interesting read. I couldn't find this being mentioned on the list before, so here it is:



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Julia Usage Analysis Paper

Stefan Karpinski
Yes, that's the one major flaw in that original blog post. If I'd just left out the "1.0" bit, it would have been much better.


On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Mike Innes <[hidden email]> wrote:
The original blog post announces that 1.0 is being released, so it's an understandable mistake.


On 29 July 2014 05:32, Dahua <[hidden email]> wrote:
Despite several minor mistakes like these, I think the analysis in general is useful.

Dahua



On Monday, July 28, 2014 7:48:06 PM UTC-5, Iain Dunning wrote:
Seems like an undergrad project? I think by 1.0 they mean the 0.1 release.

On Monday, July 28, 2014 8:00:44 AM UTC-4, Ivar Nesje wrote:
From the abstract: "(work began in 2009 and 1.0 was released in 2012)".

I'll send an email directly to the authors (in case they don't read julia-dev).

Ivar

kl. 12:57:36 UTC+2 mandag 28. juli 2014 skrev Tomek Trzeciak følgende:
I've come across this paper analysing usage of Julia language features, an interesting read. I couldn't find this being mentioned on the list before, so here it is: